Perception Errors as Seen in “Twelve Angry Men” Essay

The innocent and the beautiful absorb no enemy but season William Butler Yeats The movie Twelve indignant Men opens up with a duration which justifies the above stated quote. The legendline follows the story of two random people chosen as jurors who have been asked to give a verdict on a run into case. The case involves the murder of a dumbfound by his teenage son. The verdict basis be held legal and valid sole(prenominal) if it is unanimous. At the start of the movie, every angiotensin-converting enzyme except a serviceman votes as blameworthy for the boy.The gentleman expresses his desire to go over all in all the facts after which he would make his conclusiveness whether the stripling is guilty or not. later on several deliberations, re-questioning of the stated facts and witness testimonials, lento the jurors start changing their verdict from guilty to not-guilty. The story ends with the unanimous verdict in the favor of the stripling. Common Perceptual Distort ions 1. stereotype or Prototype star of the jurors has the doctrine that adolescents growing up in slums hunt to be criminals. A usualization on the behalf of the juror is incorrect. . Projection One of the jurors sh ars a failing relationship with his own son. This creates an operation wherein he sees the image of his son in the teenager held in the trial.He tries to cast his own conscious image onto the teenager and sees him as guilty. 3. Self Fulfilling Prophecy One of the jurors is timid in nature and wherefore his opinions are not heard and ignored. 4. mine is better thinking One of the jurors thinks that since he is an influential person in his domain, he hold ups better because of his higher status in society. . Selective Perception One of the jurors is just interested in finishing the verdict. He has no arguments in favour or against the teenager. 6. Pretending to Know One of the jurors tries to free everything by giving the statement know what I mean, inspite of having no concrete facts supporting his arguments. 7. Unwarranted Assumptions One of the jurors holds onto the recommendation that the murder weapon is unique. Also iodine more assumption is the thing that the upchuck man can cover a long distance to the stairs in a few seconds. 8.Attacking some other people One of the jurors starts fighting and cheering at everyone as if that would prove that others are wrong. 9. Halo Effect The fact that the teenager stays in the slums creates a general impression in one of the jurors minds that the teenager is guaranteed a criminal. 10. False Consensus Effect At the beginning of the session, all but one decide as guilty on the verdict. Many of the jurors gave their vote just on the simple reason that others would give the same, and not on their own opinions.