Relativism and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 3

Relativism and Morality - Essay ExampleIt was just prevail to rear forth that some things be just basically wrong non because they are neer questioned or breached in pr wagerice, but because they never should be (88). Goodmans disagreed on Matilals idea of pluralism that norms resist from one society to another. Goodman argued that while Matilals assertion in mevery aspect are true, the imagination of what is right and wrong is not just about common consent but unanimity. For what is agreed by many may not necessarily mean right. In plain language, mob rule is not always right. Such, Goodman puts forth the four areas which human experience where right or wrong is constant no matter of time, culture, understanding, religion or circumstance. It may already be a common knowledge but Goodman, put coherence and logic why these acts are not to be done in the first place. They are (1) genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare (2) scareism, hostage taking, and child war riors (3) slavery, polygamy, and incest and (4) rape and female genital cutting. We already know that murder is wrong much much when it is done on mass scale which what happens in genocide. Goodman succinctly put the argument what we already that all living beings key out claims to life. ... It is not correct limited to a tyrants prejudice, but can to a fault be glossed over with right intention such as Maoist Cultural Revolution where he was ready, he bragged in 1958, to turn over 300 million lives which composed half of Chinas population, for the victory of world revolution. Goodman also hit the head of the nail to bury the very reason why terrorism is utterly wrong. His reason stood above the excuse of justifying terror that one mans terrorist is another mans immunity fighter. The excuse of subjectivity, that one group may disagree while another may stick it laudable was paled with Goodmans exposure and giving terror a face why it is just wrong. It wilfully targets non-co mbatants and intend to intimidate and attract attention at the cost of many lives. Its obscenity and flagrancy as an act was exposed when Goodman rightfully conveyed that in terrorism, the more helpless the victims, the more lurid the light. . . The more devastating the damage, the more inhumane, the more avidly is it sought by the strategists, ideologues, and theologians of terror. The vileness of intention which was unmasked by Goodman just unembellished terrorism any of its political justification that made it acceptable to some sectors in society. The excuse of addressing terrors root cause also became moot as Goodman explained that soft pedaling the act of sowing fear make them pushes the pedal complicit with those who seek to profit politically from the mayhem. Equally unacceptable as murder in any form or method, is also the exploitation of individual be it in the form of slavery, prostitution or any form of exploitation